This is what [Kristol] wrote on the pages of the Weekly Standard in the days leading up to the Iraq war:
We are tempted to comment, in these last days before the war, on the U.N., and the French, and the Democrats. But the war itself will clarify who was right and who was wrong about weapons of mass destruction. It will reveal the aspirations of the people of Iraq, and expose the truth about Saddam’s regime. … History and reality are about to weigh in, and we are inclined simply to let them render their verdicts.
If at first you don’t succeed, try and try again.
Transcript:
KRISTOL: We have to be ready to use military force against Iran, if it comes to that. Think what this crisis would be like given what we now know about the Islamic Republic of Iran, its regime, its recklessness, its close, close ties to terrorist groups. Think what the world wore would be like with an Iran with nuclear weapons. This is a very interesting moment in that respect. You know? We are in a way lucky that Iran has revealed its aggression, its recklessness, its terror ties before they succeeded in becoming a nuclear power. We have to stop them from getting nuclear weapons. We can try diplomacy. I am not hopeful about that. We have to be ready to use force.
QUESTION: You know, the down side, though, you know very well, to all of that being that we’re involved in Iraq and Afganistan. Also that Iran is much different than Iraq. It’s huge and more formidable.
KRISTOL: It is, but also the Iranian people dislike their regime. I think they would be – the right use of targeted military force — but especially if political pressure before we use military force – could cause them to reconsider whether they really want to have this regime in power. There are even moderates – they are not wonderful people — but people in the government itself who are probably nervous about Ahmadinejad’s recklessness.
This is why standing up to Iran right now is so important. They’re overreached. They and Hezbollah have recklessly overreached. They got cocky. This is the moment to set them back. I think a setback to Hezbollah could trigger changes in Iran. People can say, wait a second, what is Ahmadinejad doing to us. We’re alone. The Arab world is even against us. The Muslim world is against us. Let’s reconsider this reckless path that we’re on.
This must be more of that real/Riehl world view I keep hearing about. Whatever they're smoking, it must be good shit. Either way, I don't know where Kristol finds the fucking nerve to
- show his face on camera;
- offer his opinion about anything, as if he knows what the fuck he's talking about;
- pretend he wasn't completely clueless about Iraq.
And what's with the "we/us" shit, motherfucker? Nobody named Kristol will be doing any of the fighting or dying, nor will anybody named Kristol truly feel the crunch of $4 or $5 a gallon gas, or lose their job or house in the concomitant economic problems of such a situation. You're in a gated community with your think tank country club asshole friends, Billy, and eventually the suckers in your base will put down their bibles for two seconds and catch on to your little grift. (Or not.)
There is no "we", there is no "us". There's people who run the world with their ruinous policies; there's the lackeys of that class who profit by doing their unholy bidding; and then there's the rest of us who actually get to deal with all the consequences of the short-sighted idiocy of these cocksuckers. Kristol is in that second class, the lackeys, hoping that if he snorkels enough elite cock, his vaunted neocon intemellectual status will get him in good with his masters.
I'm not sure who is more contemptible -- people like Kristol who, no matter how often or how badly they've been proven wrong, don't know when to shut the fuck up; the "news" shows who keep letting them slither on to their "serious" discussions; or the halfwits who don't have enough goddamned sense to vote with their remotes.
No comments:
Post a Comment