Translate

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

Eighth Continent

So there's this gargantuan mass of garbage, twice the size of Texas, conglomerated out in the Pacific Ocean.

The enormous stew of trash - which consists of 80 percent plastics and weighs some 3.5 million tons, say oceanographers - floats where few people ever travel, in a no-man's land between San Francisco and Hawaii.

Marcus Eriksen, director of research and education at the Algalita Marine Research Foundation in Long Beach, said his group has been monitoring the Garbage Patch for 10 years.

"With the winds blowing in and the currents in the gyre going circular, it's the perfect environment for trapping," Eriksen said. "There's nothing we can do about it now, except do no more harm."

....

"At this point, cleaning it up isn't an option," Parry said. "It's just going to get bigger as our reliance on plastics continues. ... The long-term solution is to stop producing as much plastic products at home and change our consumption habits."

Parry said using canvas bags to cart groceries instead of using plastic bags is a good first step; buying foods that aren't wrapped in plastics is another.


Whoa, whoa, whoa. Looky here, Wavy Gravy. It's in several books of the Bible that God wanted us to use disposable plastic bags at the supermarket. Dude, why do you hate America and God?

More seriously, I don't see how consumption patterns will ever change until lifestyle patterns change, chief among them the use and distribution of water:

One day last June, an environmental engineer named Bradley Udall appeared before a Senate subcommittee that was seeking to understand how severe the country’s fresh-water problems might become in an era of global warming. As far as Washington hearings go, the testimony was an obscure affair, which was perhaps fitting: Udall is the head of an obscure organization, the Western Water Assessment. The bureau is located in the Boulder, Colo., offices of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the government agency that collects obscure data about the sky and seas. Still, Udall has a name that commands some attention, at least within the Beltway. His father was Morris Udall, the congressman and onetime presidential candidate, and his uncle was Stewart Udall, the secretary of the interior under Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson. Bradley Udall’s great-great-grandfather, John D. Lee, moreover, was the founder of Lee’s Ferry, a flyspeck spot in northern Arizona that means nothing to most Americans but holds near-mythic status to those who work with water for a living. Near Lee’s Ferry is where the annual flow of the Colorado River is measured in order to divvy up its water among the seven states that depend on it. To many politicians, economists and climatologists, there are few things more important than what has happened at Lee’s Ferry in the past, just as there are few things more important than what will happen at Lee’s Ferry in the future.

The importance of the water there was essentially what Udall came to talk about. A report by the National Academies on the Colorado River basin had recently concluded that the combination of limited Colorado River water supplies, increasing demands, warmer temperatures and the prospect of recurrent droughts “point to a future in which the potential for conflict” among those who use the river will be ever-present. Over the past few decades, the driest states in the United States have become some of our fastest-growing; meanwhile, an ongoing drought has brought the flow of the Colorado to its lowest levels since measurements at Lee’s Ferry began 85 years ago. At the Senate hearing, Udall stated that the Colorado River basin is already two degrees warmer than it was in 1976 and that it is foolhardy to imagine that the next 50 years will resemble the last 50. Lake Mead, the enormous reservoir in Arizona and Nevada that supplies nearly all the water for Las Vegas, is half-empty, and statistical models indicate that it will never be full again. “As we move forward,” Udall told his audience, “all water-management actions based on ‘normal’ as defined by the 20th century will increasingly turn out to be bad bets.”


We fancy ourselves as free-marketeers, living Adam Smith's centuries-old exalted dream. But that's silly -- not Smith's dream, which is still intact at least in principle, but that we embody that dream. Instead, we seem to be living on magical thinking, not just the basic idea that we can get something for nothing (as the burgeoning casino and lottery industries can attest), but that infrastructural concerns either resolve themselves or simply run on good thoughts and fairy dust.

Magical thinking is in every Hummer, Excursion, Yukon, etc., that clogs our already saturated highways and cities. It's in every new strip mall carved out of prime agricultural land. Such vehicles and structures implicitly presume that something will come along, in terms of scarce fuel and parking space, because something always has.

That is, quite literally, the way children operate. Externalities are someone else's problem, and anyway, no one else is curtailing their behavior, so why should I? Conversely, if everyone else does curtail their behavior, that frees up enough room for me to self-actualize via toys and doodads, shit I don't really need or even want, bought with money I don't really have.

With that prevalent mindset, it makes sense that water scarcity and usage is a growing issue, that the oceans and waterways are dumps, that various types of seafood have been rapidly overfished in some places, hopelessly polluted in others.

Udall suggested that I meet a water manager named Peter Binney, who works for Aurora, Colo., a city — the 60th-largest in the United States — that sprawls over an enormous swath of flat, postagricultural land south of the Denver airport. It may be difficult for residents of the East Coast to understand the political celebrity of some Western water managers, but in a place like Aurora, where water, not available land, limits economic growth, Binney has enormous responsibilities. In effect, the city’s viability depends on his wherewithal to conjure new sources of water or increase the output of old ones. As Binney told me when we first spoke, “We have to find a new way of meeting the needs of all this population that’s turning up and still satisfy all of our recreational and environmental demands.” Aurora has a population of 310,000 now, Binney said, but that figure is projected to surpass 500,000 by 2035.

I asked if he had enough water for that many people. “Oh, no,” he replied. He seemed surprised that someone could even presume that he might. In fact, he explained, his job is to figure out how to find more water in a region where every drop is already spoken for and at a moment when there is little possibility that any more will ever be discovered.


It doesn't necessarily have to be global warming that gets us; waste and ignorance are chugging along just fine.

No comments: